INTERNET DISKURSIDA IMLO ME’YORIDAN CHEKINISHLARNING PRAGMATIK XUSUSIYATLARI (O‘zbek va ingliz tillari misolida)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v19iB.1835Keywords:
internet diskursi, imlo me’yori, grafik chekinish, kiberpragmatika, kontekstuallashtiruvchi ishora, xushmuomalalik, digrafiya, o‘zbek tili, ingliz tili.Abstract
Maqolada internet diskursida imlo me’yoridan og‘ishning pragmatik tabiati o‘zbek va ingliz tillari qiyosida tadqiq etiladi. Raqamli yozishmadagi harf takrori, qisqartma, bosh harf va tinish belgisining noodatiy qo‘llanishi, diakritik belgining tushirib qoldirilishi, yozuv tizimining almashtirilishi xato sifatida emas, kommunikativ niyatni signal qiluvchi kontekstuallashtiruvchi ishora sifatida talqin qilinadi. Kompyuter vositasidagi diskurs tahlili, relevantlik va xushmuomalalik nazariyalariga tayanib, chekinishlarning 5 funksional turi ajratiladi: prosodik-emotiv, iqtisodiy, grafik-intonatsion, identifikatsion va ludik-istehzoli. Ongli chekinishni tasodifiy xatodan farqlash mezonlari taklif etiladi. Ingliz internet yozuvidagi og‘ishlar asosan chuqur orfografiya bilan talaffuz o‘rtasidagi tafovutdan oziqlanishi, o‘zbek yozishmalarida esa diakritika, lotin-kirill digrafiyasi va rus tilli internet vositachiligida shakllangan grafik an’analar bilan bog‘lanishi ko‘rsatildi. O‘zbek foydalanuvchisining grafik erkinligi milliy muloqot odobi bilan cheklanishi, yoshi katta adresatga yo‘llangan ritual formulalar deyarli me’yoriy shaklda qolishi ham aniqlandi. Natijalar kiberpragmatika, qiyosiy pragmalingvistika va til siyosati uchun ahamiyatli.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:
1. Agha, A. (2003). The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 231–273.
2. Androutsopoulos, J. K. (2000). Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(4), 514–533.
3. Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 145–161). Oslo: Novus.
4. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204.
5. Brody, S., & Diakopoulos, N. (2011). Cooooooooooooooollllllllllllll!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Using word lengthening to detect sentiment in microblogs. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 562–570). Edinburgh: Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Darics, E. (2013). Non-verbal signalling in digital discourse: The case of letter repetition. Discourse, Context & Media, 2(3), 141–148.
10. Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268.
11. Egamnazarova, D. Sh. The creative power of graphological innovations in English. Uz Conferences, 2026
12. Egamnazarova, D.Sh. (2025). Zamonaviy ingliz va o‘zbek she’riyatida sintaktik deviatsiyalarning badiiy-funksional tahlili. Buxoro davlat universiteti ilmiy axboroti, (5), 107–110.
13. Franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C., & the Association of Internet Researchers. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers.
14. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
15. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gunraj, D. N., Drumm-Hewitt, A. M., Dashow, E. M., Upadhyay, S. S. N., & Klin, C. M. (2016). Texting insincerely: The role of the period in text messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1067–1075.
17. Hakimov, M. (2013). O‘zbek pragmalingvistikasi asoslari. Toshkent: Akademnashr.
18. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Houghton, K. J., Upadhyay, S. S. N., & Klin, C. M. (2018). Punctuation in text messages may convey abruptness. Period. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 112–117.
20. Jaffe, A. (2000). Introduction: Non-standard orthography and non-standard speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(4), 497–513.
21. Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. McCulloch, G. (2019). Because Internet: Understanding the new rules of language. New York: Riverhead Books.
23. O‘zbek tilining asosiy imlo qoidalari. (1995). O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining 1995-yil 24-avgustdagi 339-son qarori bilan tasdiqlangan.
24. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Lotin yozuviga asoslangan o‘zbek alifbosini joriy etish to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni. (1993). 1993-yil 2-sentabr; 1995-yil 6-maydagi o‘zgartirishlar bilan.
25. Safarov, Sh. (2008). Pragmalingvistika. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi.
26. Sebba, M. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Squires, L. (2010). Enregistering internet language. Language in Society, 39(4), 457–492.
29. Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34.
30. Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667–701.
31. Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1).
32. Vandergriff, I. (2013). Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics, 51, 1–12.
33. Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Downloads
Published
Iqtiboslik olish
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.