METAPHYSICAL TOPOGRAPHY AS A FORM OF ARTISTIC WORLD MODELING IN M.A.BULGAKOV’S NOVEL «THE MASTER AND MARGARITA»

METAPHYSICAL TOPOGRAPHY AS A FORM OF ARTISTIC WORLD MODELING IN M.A.BULGAKOV’S NOVEL «THE MASTER AND MARGARITA»

Authors

  • Shamshina Sofya Yevgenevna First-year Master’s student at Chirchik State Pedagogical University (CSPU), Uzbekistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v18iC.1746

Keywords:

Metaphysical topography, literary space, chronotope, liminality, ontological hierarchy, M.A.Bulgakov, The Master and Margarita

Abstract

In contemporary literary studies, space is no longer understood solely as a descriptive or aesthetic category but is increasingly interpreted as a fundamental form of artistic world modeling. This article examines the concept of metaphysical topography as a theoretical framework for analyzing spatial organization in literary texts. Drawing on the ideas of M. M.Bakhtin, Y.M.Lotman, M.Heidegger, M.Eliade, and G.Bachelard, the study explores metaphysical space as a hierarchically structured system of ontological, axiological, and existential meanings. The theoretical model is applied to M.A.Bulgakov’s novel «The Master and Margarita», where spatial organization functions as a key mechanism of meaning production. The analysis demonstrates that the novel constructs a          multi-level metaphysical topography integrating Moscow, Jerusalem, and otherworldly dimensions into a unified philosophical model of being, moral responsibility, and freedom of choice. The novelty of the study lies in interpreting Bulgakov’s spatial model not merely as a narrative structure but as a coherent metaphysical system that integrates ontological hierarchy with psychological reality.

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:

1. Lurie, I. K. Topography. In: Great Russian Encyclopedia. Vol. 32. Moscow: Great Russian Encyclopedia, 2016. P. 288.

2. Bakhtin, M. M. Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel. In: Essays on Historical Poetics. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura, 1975. 504 p. P. 121.

3. Lotman, Y. M. The Structure of the Artistic Text. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1970. 384 p.

4. Heidegger, M. Being and Time. Trans. by V. V. Bibikhin. Kharkov: Folio, 2003. 503 p. P. 61.

5. Eliade, M. The Sacred and the Profane. Moscow: Moscow State University Press, 1994. 144 p. P. 22.

6. Bachelard, G. The Poetics of Space. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 352 p. P. 39.

7. van Gennep, A. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960. 198 p.

8. Turner, V. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969. 213 p. Pp. 94–113.

9. Yanovskaya, L. The Creative Path of Mikhail Bulgakov. Moscow: Sovetsky Pisatel, 1983. 320 p.

10. Barratt, A. Between Two Worlds: A Critical Introduction to The Master and Margarita. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987. 214 p.

11. Milne, L. Mikhail Bulgakov: A Critical Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 312 p.

12. Bulgakov, M. A. The Master and Margarita. Moscow: AST, 2024. 512 p.

Published

2026-06-18

Iqtiboslik olish

Yevgenevna, S. S. (2026). METAPHYSICAL TOPOGRAPHY AS A FORM OF ARTISTIC WORLD MODELING IN M.A.BULGAKOV’S NOVEL «THE MASTER AND MARGARITA». QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI, 18(C), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v18iC.1746
Loading...